---

Rapid City SD- On August 13, Mayor Jason Salamun sat on a stage at an Elevate Rapid City luncheon, one of several panelists arranged across a small riser, answering questions about the Indoor Sports Complex rising off Mall Drive. Also on the panel: Domico Rodriguez, executive director of the Rapid City Sports Commission. Caleb Arceneaux, CEO of Liv Hospitality. Annika Stephens, director of the Black Hills Juniors Volleyball Club.

The room wasn’t locked — Elevate’s own promotional post invited residents to “be part of the conversation,” with registration closing the Tuesday before. But the invitation didn’t travel far: the event’s Facebook page shows just seven likes and two shares.

The public wasn’t excluded from the sports complex panel. It just largely didn’t know it was happening. The only account most residents got of what was said arrived a day later, as a recap posted to the City of Rapid City’s own Facebook page.

A Distinction the Public Isn’t Buying

That recap did some careful work. It drew a bright line between two things Rapid City voters have heard mashed together for months: the Destination District TIF, which voters rejected at referendum in January 2026, and the Catalyst TIF, which is financing the sports complex and — per the city’s own words — “continues to move forward” regardless. “The complex is a separate project entirely,” the post read.

The commenters underneath it didn’t buy the distinction.

“Wait the voters did not approve of this project? Then why is it going ahead?” wrote one resident.

“The voters are who live hear (sic) and if the community doesn’t support it how is this fiscally responsible?”

Another asked whether there was “a way to reign in Elevate Rapid City,” listing the sports complex alongside Libertyland and the incoming data center as bad ideas flowing from what he called “business-minded professionals.”

A third went further: Elevate, the Mayor’s office, and the Sports Commission, he wrote, are “nothing but a bunch of self-serving, self-promoting organizations and individuals.”

One commenter pushed back with the fairer read — Elevate functions like any Chamber of Commerce, advocating for its business members, and “any mayor would need to be able to work with groups like that.”

Then, further down, one resident wrote what a lot of people seem to be thinking: “I think it needs to be brought to a public vote!”

Domico Rodriguez answered her directly. “The council voted on this last September. We have had several public forums in the past three years. We are now past those opportunities.”

The Panel Had a Stake in the Answer

Rodriguez isn’t a bystander in that exchange.

He’s the paid executive director of the Rapid City Sports Commission — a nonprofit whose own 2024 filings put his compensation at $89,193 — and he sits as a recurring attendee at the meetings of Business Improvement District No. 2, the hotel-tax board actually financing the complex.

Caleb Arceneaux, seated beside him on the panel, isn’t just an attendee at those meetings. He’s one of BID #2’s five voting members.

Two of the four “expert” voices reassuring a thinly-attended room that the public had already had its say were, themselves, financially and organizationally invested in the answer being no.

The luncheon itself wasn’t neutral ground, either. Per Elevate’s own promotional post, the August 13 panel was sponsored by Sanford Health – Black Hills — the same company that, a week earlier, had already locked in the $10 million naming-rights deal for the very facility the panel existed to discuss.

The company about to have its name on the building paid to help stage the public’s one chance to ask questions about it.

Another commenter replied to Rodriguez without hesitation: “We are never past the opportunities for a public vote.” The original resident followed up a few hours later: “The council voted. Not the voters.”

That distinction is about to matter again, and soon.

Already on Monday’s Agenda

On August 6, the city announced that Sanford Health had won naming rights to the complex — $10 million over 20 years, beginning in 2027.

Rodriguez was quoted in the official announcement, not just defending the process but actively selling it — pointing to Sanford’s track record in the Sioux Falls and Fargo markets and saying the partnership would “benefit Rapid City and our athletes for the next generation.”

The deal has a case number now, too: it’s Item 25 on Monday’s City Council agenda, LF081226-05, “Approve Sports Complex Naming Recognition Agreement between the City of Rapid City and Sanford Health.”

The Legal & Finance Committee has already recommended approval, 4-0, with Council President Stephen Tamang abstaining.

Which means the sequence, once again, is: announce it, brand it, hold a panel to walk it through with a mostly-empty room, and let the vote come after the public conversation has effectively already happened without the public in it.

It’s the same order of operations Rapid City has now run on the Northline Business Park land and the Catalyst TIF amendment that financed it — present the outcome first, treat the vote as procedure.

What the Name Carries

Here, though, the outcome is a name.

And the name carries a history the city’s Facebook recap didn’t mention, because there was no reason for it to: T. Denny Sanford, the donor whose name the complex will carry, was investigated for years by South Dakota and federal authorities after nude images of underage girls, some as young as 8, were found in an email account linked to him in 2019.

The South Dakota Attorney General’s office closed its investigation in 2022 without filing charges, stating it found no prosecutable offense within the state’s jurisdiction. The status of any federal inquiry has never been publicly confirmed as closed. Sanford has never been charged with a crime.

None of that makes the naming decision automatically wrong.

It does mean it’s a decision — not a formality — and decisions about whose name goes on a $76 million facility built partly with public financing, used by the city’s kids, are exactly the kind of thing a public vote or a public comment period exists for.

So far, the closest thing Rapid City residents have gotten to a public forum on it was a members’ organization’s lunch panel, sponsored by the company asking for the name, that seven people liked on Facebook.

Council votes on the naming agreement Monday, carrying a 4-0 committee recommendation already behind it. Whether anyone outside that room gets a chance to weigh in before the gavel drops is still an open question.

Sourcing

---

Facts on the August 13 Elevate Rapid City panel and the Destination District/Catalyst TIF distinction are drawn from the City of Rapid City Municipal Government’s own Facebook post, published August 14, 2026, and public comments beneath it.

Luncheon registration terms, sponsorship, and event engagement numbers are drawn from Elevate Rapid City’s own Facebook promotional posts and event page.

Domico Rodriguez’s compensation and role, and Caleb Arceneaux’s status as a BID #2 voting member, are drawn from prior Sentinel reporting on BID #2 financing.

Naming rights deal terms ($10M/20yr) and Rodriguez’s promotional quote are drawn from Sanford Sports’ official August 6, 2026 press release.

Agenda item LF081226-05 and the Legal & Finance Committee’s recommendation are drawn from the City of Rapid City’s official August 17, 2026 Council meeting agenda.

Background on the T. Denny Sanford investigation is drawn from South Dakota Attorney General court filings and reporting by ProPublica and Forbes, including the unsealing of search warrant affidavits in 2023.

Filed Under a Hotel Tax Board: How Rapid City’s Sports Complex Financing Hid in Plain Sight

With Sanford’s $10M Locked In For Rapid City’s Sports Complex, City Council Eyes Next Steps

The Optics Check: A $10 Million Trial Balloon and the Shadow Over Rapid City’s Youth Sports Complex

A Tricky Gift from Lien: The Sports Complex Enters the Legal and Finance Committee Agenda

Twins From the Start: What the TIF Ledger Actually Shows About the Catalyst District